Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Holt

(after stating the case as above).

Appellant insists the evidence did not warrant a finding that the direct and proximate cause of Stanley Holt’s death was the injury to his foot, and that the trial court therefore erred when he overruled its objection on that ground to the issue he submitted to the jury, when he refused its request that he instruct the jury to return a verdict in its favor and when he overruled its motion to set aside the finding of the jury.

We have read the evidence in the statement of facts, and think the contention should not be sustained.

Appellant’s witness Dr. McGregor,…