Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 8, 2007No. A06A2365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

After Kevin Howard was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, he filed a motion in limine to suppress the results of the state-administered breath test, contending that he was not given an opportunity to take an independent blood test in accordance with OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3). The trial court granted his motion, and the state appeals. We find no error and affirm.

Under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3),

a person who undergoes a chemical test at the request of a law enforcement officer is entitled to have a qualified person of his own choosing administer an additional test.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. State v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MetzagerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Ritter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API