Legal Opinion
MacEwan v. Rusk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 20, 1964No. Civ. A. 33038PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment, which in effect would declare invalid regulations issued by the Secretary of State-pursuant to which he has refused to endorse their passport for travel to and' from Cuba.
Plaintiffs originally sought the invocation of a three-judge court pursuant to-28 U.S.C. § 2282, but they withdrew this, request when the case was called for argument. They no longer seek to enjoin the enforcement or operation of any Act of Congress, but ask merely a judgment declaring that they may lawfully travel to Cuba without special validation of their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas Glenn Jolley v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Cameron David BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- MacEWAN v. RUSKCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- United States v. LaubDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. TravisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.