Legal Opinion
Hussein v. Sheraton New York Hotel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 2000No. 99 Civ. 2434(SHS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Mamdouh M. Hussein (“Hussein”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 et seq. (“LMRA”). Plaintiff alleges that he and similarly situated banquet waiters were denied equal wages and opportunities and that their union failed to adequately represent them regarding this denial. Plaintiff seeks equal pay and back wages. Defendants Hotel Association of New York (“Association”), Sheraton New York Hotel (“Sheraton Hotel”), and New York Hotel and Motel Trade Council move to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowen-Hooks v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Hussein v. the Waldorf-AstoriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Kissan v. ModiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Meilus v. Restaurant Opportunities Center United, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson (PATH)District Court, S.D. New York · 2023