Highway Commissioners v. Van Dusan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Yan Dusan sued on the common counts for services in making a sewer. A written agreement had been signed and he claimed for an unpaid portion of the agreed price and for some items supposed to be outside of the express terms, but asserted to be justly chargeable. It appears that recovery was opposed on several grounds, but vainly. The main one seems to have been that the improvement as contracted for and carried out was not in a part of the township open to the exercise of such authority or where such things could be done at township cost, but was upon territory which in fact was under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Township of Taymouth v. KoehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Horton v. . Town of ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robertson v. BaxterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- McCurdy v. County of ShiawasseeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Harrison County v. OgdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914