United States v. King
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Carl C. King and others were indicted for a conspiracy in restraint of trade. On demurrer to the indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
This is an indictment for a conspiracy in restraint of trade under the Sherman Act. The defendants have demurred, and have assigned many causes of demurrer, which fall into two groups, viz. those which relate to the language of the indictment, and those which relate to its subject-matter.
[1] As to the objections based on the alleged insufficiency or inaccuracy of the language:
The defendants contend that the indictment does not allege that a conspiracy was actually entered upon and engaged in. This argument is based principally upon the use of the word “should” in that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lawlor v. LoeweSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Atlantic Commission Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1942
- United States v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Barnard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Mercer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.