Legal Opinion

Hein v. Gresen Division, Dana Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 3, 1995No. C2-94-2259PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Relator Bruce Hein seeks review of a . Commissioner’s representative’s decision disqualifying him from receiving reemployment insurance benefits. Because the Commissioner’s representative’s decision was based upon an incomplete record, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent Gresen Division, Dana Corporation, is a manufacturer of hydraulic valves. For over twenty years, relator worked for respondent as a full-time lead person in the receiving department.

Respondent has a policy prohibiting drug and alcohol use on the job. Respondent discharged relator because he failed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Transportation Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Appelhof v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hein v. Gresen DivisionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API