Greenlee v. Schoenheit
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Richardson county. Tried below before Broady, J. Hutchinson v. Hubbard, 31 N. W. R., 245. Woolheather v. Rislty, 38 Iowa, 491. Rafferty v. Buckman, 46 Id., 195. Warrick v. Rornids, 17 Neb., 411. Wight-man v. Devere, 33 Wis., 579. King v. Bell, 13 Neb., 414. Roberts v. Taylor, 19 Id., 184.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ci-i. J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Richardson county, by plaintiff in error against defendants in *670error, for the purpose of recovering damages alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of the sale of intoxicating liquors to Eli Greenlee, her husband. It is alleged in the petition that the plaintiff and said Eli were married on the 25th day of June, 1869, and that she has ever since lived with him as his wife; that they have five children, whose names are given, and all of whom are under fifteen years of age; that plaintiff and her said husband and her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woolheather v. RisleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Hemmens v. BentleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- In re HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pilkins v. HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1910