Legal Opinion

King v. Insurance Company of North America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1968No. 275PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled. The motion to strike the allegations concerning the recovery of punitive damages and the prayer therefor is in the nature of a judgment sustaining a demurrer for the failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for the recovery of punitive damages. Oil Co. v. Richardson, 271 N.C. 696, 157 S.E. 2d 369; Williams v. Hunter, 257 N.C. 754, 127 S.E. 2d 546. In this respect there is a distinction between an order striking portions of a pleading because redundant, irrelevant, evidentiary or otherwise improper allegations and an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Richardson v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Hutchinson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Roberson v. DaleDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API