Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
David B. Higginbottom City Attorney Frostproof
QUESTION:
Is a municipality authorized by law to require abutting landowners who request vacation of a public street to prove a revesionary interest in the property and pay for the proportionate costs of an appraisal and for the proportionate appraised value of such property interest as conditions to the vacation?
SUMMARY:
A municipality possesses no authority under the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act to require property owners whose land abuts a dedicated public street to `prove a reversionary interest' or any other property interest or property…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. City of SunriseSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- City of Miami Beach v. Forte Towers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Daniels v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.