Legal Opinion

Anderson v. The Rence

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 6, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

The claim of the libel in this case is for “wages, for provisions of bad quality, and a failure to furnish antiscorbutics, and for damages for the same cause; also, damages for furnishing improper subsistence,'cost of maintenance during sickness contracted in the service of the vessel, and cost of care, under the statutory and general admiralty law.” The evidence as to the quantity and quality of the provisions furnished to the men is very voluminous and conflicting. The seamen’s statements with respect to the bad quality of the food are evidently much exaggerated, and I think it unnecessary…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olson v. Oregon Coal & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Petersen v. J. F. Cunningham Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
  3. The WestportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  4. The Edward R. WestDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API