Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Wright v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1916No. 13534PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered April 11, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to compel the issuance of special fund warrants in payment for a public improvement, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This case was before the court and opinion rendered in Wright v. Tacoma, 87 Wash. 334, 151 Pac. 837, to which reference should be made. Counsel for both sides accept that opinion in so far as it establishes the claim of respondent. Beyond that, there is a positive disagreement as to its meaning and legal effect. The case was remanded and a judgment entered as follows:
“Now therefore it is by the court considered, ordered and adjudged that plaintiff George P. Wright do have and recover of and from the defendant city of Tacoma, a municipal corporation, the sum of $97,095.91 with 6% per annum…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Bremerton v. North Pacific Public Service Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1917