Legal Opinion

United States v. Darryl Farley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1993No. 92-4113PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order allowing closed circuit testimony and the admission of certain hearsay statements during his trial. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Background

Defendant-appellant Darrell Farley was indicted for aggravated assault in violation of §§ 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) and 1153(a), after he engaged in forced intercourse with a five year old girl on a Navajo Reservation. The government filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3509 requesting that the testimony of the victim be presented via two-way closed circuit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Matthew Wayne TomeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API