Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Locklar

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

The only question for determination here is whether the setting* aside and cancellation of a deed made in fraud of judgment creditors bars the wife’s inchoate right of dower, she having joined in such conveyance relinquishing her right of homestead and dower.

Appellants insist that the court erred, after cancelling the deed executed by herself and husband conveying the lands to Miss Audrey Marks, and the one from Miss Audrey Marks to intervener, Mrs. Flote Elliott, as fraudulent conveyances, in decreeing that her right of homestead and dower be subjected to the lien of appellee’s judgment and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Huntzicker v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ricketts v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCown v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API