Legal Opinion

McCown v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1932No. 4-2672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kieby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The legal principles governing transactions between husband and wife where the interest of third parties intervene are well settled by numerous decisions of this court. While such transactions are closely scrutinized, they are, when made in good faith and for a fair consideration, upheld by our court to the same extent as transactions between strangers. In Mente v. Westbrook, 181 Ark. 96, 24 S. W. (2d) 976, the court, discussing an alleged fraudulent conveyance between a husband and wife, said:

“It is also well settled that, if the evidence shows that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Driggs & Co.'s Bank v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Hershy v. LathamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  3. Davis v. YongeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Block v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  5. George Taylor Commission Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sieb's Hatcheries, Inc. v. LindleyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  2. Wasson v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API