Guggenheim v. Hoffman

This case was before this court at a former term (128 Ill. App. 289) and was reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Another trial has resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, to reverse which this writ of error has been prosecuted. The former opinion contained a sufficient recital of the facts which were substantially the same on this trial as on the last, and we deem it unnecessary to repeat them except in so far as it may be found necessary to a discussion of the alleged errors argued in the brief of plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called the…