Legal Opinion
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 3, 2003No. 3:03 CV 00313(GLG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action of first impression challenge the constitutionality of the judicial rules of the Connecticut Superior Court and state statutes providing for orders to seal Connecticut state court files. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief. Before this court are defendants’ motions for dismissal of the complaint and intervening-complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. # 10 and # 22).
I. Factual Background
On February 21, 2003, plaintiff the Hartford Courant Company [“the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartford Courant Co. v. PellegrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Hartford Courant Co. v. PellegrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Hartford Courant Co. v. PellegrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009