Legal Opinion

Birch v. Hanley

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARK A. SULLIVAN, Jr., J.S.C.

This application concerns the continued viability of N.J.S.A.2A:65-3 in awarding landlords treble damages for waste committed by tenants. The Statute in question provides:

“A civil action may be maintained in the superior court against the tenant, and upon a finding that waste has been committed, treble damages shall be assessed or granted, and the defendant shall lose the thing or place wasted.”

Although the genesis of this Statute dates back to England when the Statute of Marlbridge was enacted in 1267. There is very little recent case law on the subject.

In 1950…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vollertsen v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cruickshanks v. EakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Creekmore v. Redman Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Micuda v. McDonald (In Re Evergreen Ventures)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1992
  5. Fox v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API