Legal Opinion
Cruickshanks v. Eak
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 285 (1954)
110 A.2d 61
STANLEY CRUICKSHANKS, GORDON CRUICKSHANKS, WILLIAM CRUICKSHANKS AND REID CRUICKSHANKS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THOMAS EAK, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided December 7, 1954.
Mr. John P. Kozak, attorney for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Jacob H. Bernstein, attorney for the defendant.
KALTEISSEN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
The complaint filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant in this case contains two counts. Count one alleges that certain premises owned by the plaintiffs were let on a month-to-month basis to the defendant pursuant to an oral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- People of New York v. Coe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Smith v. the Salvation ArmySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ault v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Vollertsen v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- STATE, DEP v. Larchmont FarmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Williams v. STANDARD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'NCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Gordon v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.