Legal Opinion

Lipkis v. Pikus

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The only issue presented by the question certified was whether the Appellate Division had the power to grant the relief given to petitioner by that court. The Appellate Division had the power. We pass on no other issue. Question certified answered in the affirmative (see, Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031; Serenity Homes v Town Bd., 37 NY2d 841).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Serenity Homes, Inc. v. Town Board of WappingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metzger v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API