Legal Opinion

Kotik v. Figi

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

Motion, has been made by the plaintiff for an order directing service upon his attorney of a copy of a statement taken from the plaintiff by a representative of the insurance carrier of one or more of the defendants.

Upon the argument of the motion June 9, 1958, an opportunity was granted to counsel for the defendants to present authorities supporting their opposition to the granting of the order. No authorities or answering affidavits have been submitted and there are no facts before the court contradictory to those set forth in the moving affidavit. The moving affidavit is made completely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herlihy v. CostaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Baron v. Kings-Suffolk Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Del Ra v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Swartzman v. SovaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People ex rel. Glasier v. GlasierNew York Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bassney v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schill v. HammettNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API