Legal Opinion

Love v. Harlem Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1990No. 90-094Published

1Opinion of the Court

802 P.2d 611 (1990)

Clinton LOVE and Rosemary Love, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

HARLEM IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Lary Mohar and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants and Respondents,

Clinton LOVE and Rosemary Love, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Knute KULBECK, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 90-094.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs September 27, 1990.

Decided December 4, 1990.

Rehearing Denied January 10, 1991.

David L. Irving, Glasgow, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Robert D. Morrison and Kathleen H. Richardson, Morrison, Young, Melcher, Brown & Richardson, Havre, for defendants and respondents.

WEBER,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Great Falls School District No. 1 & AMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hansen v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Frank v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Carroll v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Eccleston v. Montana Third Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API