Chacey v. Garvey
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Chief Justice DONALD W. LEMONS.
**4 In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in its interpretation and application of Code § 55-332, which sets forth the procedure for determining damages in cases involving timber trespass.
I. Facts and Proceedings
In 1995, Valerie Garvey ("Garvey") purchased approximately 50 acres of property from Allan and Susan Chacey (the "Chaceys"). The property was located at 11190 Red Oak Lane, in Markham, Virginia, and the Chaceys retained ownership of adjacent property. The Chaceys also enjoyed an easement over Garvey's property as a means…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conyers v. MARTIAL ARTS WORLD OF RICHMONDSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Mullins v. Richlands National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Advanced Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. PRC Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Caplan v. BogardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Lansdowne Development Co. v. Xerox Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lambert v. Sea Oats Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Reineck v. LemenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Westlake Legal Group v. FlynnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. v. TanaseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
- AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. v. TanaseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.