Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 13, 1964No. 4-63PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam:

The plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of the Pacific Grape Products Company which, prior to its bankruptcy, performed a contract for the United States. According to the petition, plaintiff instituted the present action “for recovery of amounts due the plaintiff by reason of the defendant’s breach of a written contract between the United States and the bankrupt corporation * *

Instead of filing an answer, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment asking that the petition be dismissed. The motion is grounded primarily upon the contention that the plaintiff’s claim is barred…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman J. Mulholland v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Gilmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Marcee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Degenaars Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Braude v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API