Hurd Urban Development, L.C. v. Federal Highway Administration
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAZEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, 1 as well as Plaintiffs’ Motion for. Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 48) and City of Laredo Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Sum mary Judgment (Dkt. No. 54). In addition to considering the briefs, the Court discussed the disputed issues with attorneys for all parties at a hearing on November 19, 1998.
I. Background
A. Facts of the Case
This dispute centers around the alignment of a road (“Bridge Road”) that is to be constructed between Interstate 35 and the soon-to-be-built International Bridge IV in north Laredo, Texas.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maiden Creek Associates, L.P. v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Maiden Creek Associates, L.P. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Moyle Petroleum v. LahoodDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013