Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Crinnian v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1924No. 4006PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Crinnian was a prohibition agent. He was indicted and convicted for soliciting and accepting a bribe in violation of section 117 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10287). It appears without dispute that Stinson and his wife were operating a hotel and drinking place in Wyandotte, near Detroit; that Crinnian and others repeatedly purchased intoxicating liquor there; that on the occasion in question, and as Crinnian came out from a private room, where he had been with Stinson, a $20 bill was picked up from the floor near him. It is the claim of Mr. and Mrs. Stinson that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Fish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1914
  3. Browne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Heaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. Rembrandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. United States v. Patricia Antoinette SpicaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Farkas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  4. Buckley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  5. Dropps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API