Legal Opinion
Margolis v. Margolis
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1952No. Civ. 19050PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From an interlocutory decree of divorce and an award to respondent husband of 8294m of the total properties of the twain accumulated since marriage, the wife appeals.
Mr. and Mrs. Margolis were married in 1902. At that time respondent was engaged in the jewelry business in Kansas City. Early in 1920 he was adjudicated a bankrupt and the couple moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico. Respondent there purchased a home which the family occupied until De cember, when at the wife’s instance the parties separated. Her attorney, Judge John Simms, represented her in the negotiations and in preparing a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Todd v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Arstein v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Marriage of DekkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Patterson v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.