Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1936No. Nos. 30,786, 30,808PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The defendant Norman R. Anderson as administrator of the estate of Mary Anderson, and also as an individual, appeals from an order denying a motion in the alternative for amended findings or a new trial. The defendant Carrie Anderson appeals from a like order.
The action is for specific performance of an alleged contract made between the deceased Mary Anderson and her nine children to leave her estate to the children in equal shares. On May 17, 1929, Ole Anderson, a resident of St. Louis county, the husband of Mary Anderson and the father of the children, died intestate, leaving…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blount v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Fiske v. LawtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Odenbreit v. UtheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jannetta v. JannettaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Chard v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re Estate of RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.