Legal Opinion
Heard v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1964No. 3367PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted of carrying a deadly weapon without a license in violation of our Code Section 22-3204. He contends that the weapon was seized pursuant to an arrest made without probable cause and therefore the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence.
About 2 a. m. on the morning of April 19, 1963, appellant was seen by two police officers entering an automobile in the 100 block of Eye Street, N. W. The officers were then proceeding under a housebreak ing lookout for a Negro male, on foot, wearing a blue shirt. The housebreaking had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- DuPont v. Crummer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Paul W. Gatlin v. United States of America, Dennis O. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Edward J. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Glass v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Franklin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.