Legal Opinion
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 10, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-125; Court 04-00608PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Gerdau Ameris-teel Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “Gerdau”) challenges Defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Defendant” or “Commerce”) final results in Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Turkey, 69 Fed.Reg. 64,731 (Dep’t Commerce Nov. 8, 2004) (“Final Results”). Defendant moves to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction. Because all of the subject entries at issue have been liquidated, this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this matter. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is granted, and this matter is dismissed.
Procedural…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Sichuan Changhong Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006