Doe v. State, Department of Public Welfare
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Jane Doe is an adult male transsexual. After an initial screening process, Doe was selected to undergo sex conversion surgery at one of the University of Minnesota Hospitals (university hospital) in its original transsexual program. The Federal funding of the university hospital’s program ended before surgery was performed on Doe. Thereafter, Doe, an eligible recipient of medical assistance (M.A.) benefits, applied to the Hennepin County Welfare Department (county welfare department) to fund the operation under its M.A. program. After an initial denial of his request, a hearing…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Lavarita D. Meriwether v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Sommers v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Rush v. ParhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Pinneke v. PreisserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Tasha S. Maggert v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.