Legal Opinion

Heritage Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. Carr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1993No. 1—91—3470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Heritage Pullman Bank & Trust Company (Trustee) filed a two-count complaint seeking a declaration of whether a simple majority or unanimity of the beneficial owners was required to authorize the sale of property in a land trust. The Trustee interpleaded as defendants the four beneficiaries, each holding a 25% beneficial interest: Evelyn Rafacz Carr, Walter Rafacz,1 the estate of Henry Rafacz, and the estate of Edward Rafacz.

After a settlement, in which the parties stipulated that only a simple majority direction was required, the Trustee petitioned for its expenses. Two beneficiaries, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. MEPC American Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re Estate of HealyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Johns v. KlecanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Losurdo Bros. v. Arkin Distributing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Douglas Theater Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Heritage Pullman Bank & Trust Co. v. CarrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. RSA Properties Mission Hills, P.C. v. Mission Hills Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  4. Douglas Theater v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API