Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ford v. Newman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1979No. 51449Published

1DissentJustice Clark

I dissent from the majority opinion. The opinion not only leaves ambiguous which State’s law it applies, it also makes the erroneous statement that Illinois and New York law are the same. It is my opinion that New York law applies, and that under the law of that State, the adopted grandchildren of the settlor would be considered to be beneficiaries of the trust.

The majority opinion states: “Our object is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the settlor. The evidence that we may consider to determine this intent is governed by the law of the forum, Illinois.” (77 Ill. 2d at 338.)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of UpjohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. In Re the Accounting of LeaskNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. VieleNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. In re the Estate of ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Ford v. NewmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API