Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Ashland v. Prickett
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1923No. 7 Div. 825PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrioken, P. J.
The complaint fails to aver, and the evidence to show, that there was due demand made on the bank for payment after the deposit o'f $104 was transferred to the account of Mr. Randall, in correction of error in the first deposit to the account of Priekett, paid out of the Randall-Adams special fund. The requisite conditions precedent to a collection against a bank for funds on general deposit in such bank, and subject to withdrawal, were discussed in First National Bank of Montgomery v. Williams, 206 Ala. 394, 90 South. 340; McCreless v. Tenn. Valley Bank (Ala. Sup.) 94 South. 722; Tobias v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Tobias v. Josiah Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- First National Bank v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- First Nat. Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Hutchinson v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Samuel Kaufman, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A-Ok Motor Lines, Inc. v. The First National Bank of Opp, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Northern Sugar Corporation v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- First City Nat. Bank v. Long-Lewis HardwareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Bradley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- First City National Bank of Oxford v. Long-Lewis Hardware Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.