Legal Opinion

Summerland v. Automobile Funding Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1925No. 12,071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, C. J.

In a proceeding instituted in a court of a justice of the peace against Arthur Lieske, a certain automobile belonging to appellee was attached as the property of Lieske, in whose possession it was at the time. There was judgment for plaintiff, to satisfy which the automobile was sold by the constable. Whereupon, the case at bar, an action for the wrongful conversion of the automobile, was commenced by appellee against the justice of the peace, the constable, the plaintiffs in the attachment suit, the principal on the attachment bond, and against appellant Summerland who was the surety on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. FettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Walker & Co. v. NorrisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McGinley v. Maryland Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Baker v. AckermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Citizens Loan & Trust Co. v. BoylesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API