Garmo v. Dean, Witter, Reynolds, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Are claims under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and The Securities Act of Washington, RCW 21.20, referable to arbitration under an arbitration clause contained in an executed brokerage agreement? We hold that the federal arbitration act, 9 U.S.C. § 2 (1982), as construed by the United States Supreme Court in South-land Corp. v. Keating, — U.S. —, 79 L. Ed. 2d 1, 104 S. Ct. 852 (1984), mandates that all claims, either statutory or nonstatutory, arising under a written brokerage agreement, be settled by arbitration in accordance with the terms of the brokerage agreement.
Facts
Customers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pinkis v. Network Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.