Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Miller County Election Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1997No. 95-1322PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal has arisen from the tortured recent history of city government in Texarkana. The issue presented is whether the General Assembly’s attempt to remedy the situation by passage of Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of 1995 violates the constitutional prohibition against special or local legislation. Ark. Const, amend. 14. The Circuit Court held Act 8 was not unconstitutional. We affirm the decision because the appellants’ abstract is flagrandy deficient.

Texarkana has a city-manager form of government. Prior to and during the six-year duration of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jolly v. HartjeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Williams v. City of TexarkanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Williams v. CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSASDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
  4. Williams v. City of TexarkanaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. City of West Memphis v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API