Legal Opinion

Packwood v. County of Kittitas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1896No. 2234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.— Hon. Carroll B. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*89The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

By this action it was sought to prevent the county of Kittitas from issuing certain proposed funding bonds, and to restrain the officers of said county, who were made defendants, from signing, attesting or countersigning said bonds. The grounds upon which these objects were sought were the alleged invalidity of the act of March 9, 1893 (Laws, p. 181), under which there had been an attempt to validate the warrants for which the funding bonds were to be issued, the invalidity of the act of March 22, 1895 (Laws, p. 465), which authorized the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. ShoudyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hunt v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Farson, Leach & Co. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  4. Moore v. City of Walla WallaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utah Savings & Trust Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hillsborough County v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Turner v. Roseberry Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kenyon v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Manly v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API