Legal Opinion
Curiale v. Ardra Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, *446Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered. February 28, 1994, which denied the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss the fifth through eighth causes of action of the amended complaint, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 7, 1994, which granted plaintiff’s motion to serve a second amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The case has not proceeded to the point where judicial estoppel would apply to prevent the requested amendments to the complaint (see, Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning v Broder, 124 AD2d 392, 393). The slow…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P. C. v. BroderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Matter of Carver v. Nassau County Interim Fin. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Taylor v. DeubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Briarpatch Limited v. Briarpatch Film Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Llama v. Mobil Service StationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.