Legal Opinion

Kushner v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated March 28, 1994, as granted the branch of the cross-motion of the defendants Ira D. Orshan, Joel Katz, Jerome Rubin, and Arrandale Management Corp. which was to disqualify the law firm of Beigel & Sandler, presently known as Beigel Schy Lasky Rifkind Goldberg Fertik & Gelber, from serving as the plaintiffs’ counsel.

Ordered, that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Stratton Group, Ltd. v. SprayregenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Griffin v. AnslowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Petrossian v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Kalish v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Bison Plumbing City, Inc. v. BendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API