Legal Opinion · Dissent

Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters of New York & Vicinity, Local Union No. 638 v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 1, 1975No. 73-1764Published

1Dissent

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge,

with whom TAMM, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges, join (dissenting):

We review here a determination of the National Labor Relations Board that Enterprise Association engaged in an illegal secondary boycott as proscribed by section 8(b)(4)(B) when it sought to enforce its interpretation of a clause in its collective bargaining contract wherein the employer agreed that certain pipefitting operations would be performed at the job-site. The majority opinion concerns itself almost entirely with the validity of the “right-to-eontrol test” which it asserts the Board used as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API