Legal Opinion
Inspector General v. St. Nicholas Apartments
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided November 15, 1996No. 96-S-26PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
Did HUD send OIG to do its “dirty work?” Not so.
I. FACTS
St. Nicholas Apartments is a multifamily housing project located in Springfield, Illinois. From February 17, 1996, to April 19, 1996, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) Inspector General performed an audit of St. Nicholas Apartments’ financial activities. The stated purpose for the audit was to determine if project funds were being used in compliance with HUD’s rules, regulations, and the terms of the Regulatory Agreement. 1 HUD claims, but Respondents deny, that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant-Appellee, v. BAY SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Inspector General v. Banner Plumbing Supply, Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998