Legal Opinion

Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Deacon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

E. P. Deacon instituted an action to recover damages from the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for the destruction of vegetables growing in his garden. It was alleged that the defendant had negligently caused surface water to accumulate and wrongfully permitted it to remain on the plaintiff’s garden with the result indicated. Madisonville, H. & E. Ry. Co. v. Graham, 147 Ky. 604, 144 S. W. 737; Madisonville, H. & E. Ry. Co. v. Thomas, 148 Ky. 131, 146 S. W. 33. Deacon was a minister and occupied the parsonage and premises as a tenant of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Georgetown v. GroffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Kreate v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Nahm & Friedman v. Register Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosa v. NavaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API