Legal Opinion

Consolidated Coach Corporation v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 26, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Stanley—

Affirming as to first mentioned judgment and reversing as to the last mentioned judgment.

The appellee Mrs. W. T. Wright sued the appellant, Consolidated Coach Corporation, for damages arising from personal injuries sustained whil§ its passenger. The corporation filed a cross-petition against the appellee Walter Burge, alleging that through the negligence of his agent he was responsible for any damage which plaintiff may have sustained. A demurrer to this cross-petition as amended was sustained, and it was dismissed over appellant’s objection. Mrs.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. BeaucondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Moore v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. City of Georgetown v. GroffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Stevens v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown Hotel Co. v. Pittsburgh Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Milwaukee General Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lexington Country Club v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  5. Home Laundry Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API