Legal Opinion

State v. Baird

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 25, 2006No. 2004-509, October Term, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendant was convicted of second-degree murder after a jury trial in Rutland District Court. The district court denied her motions for judgment of acquittal and a new trial and sentenced her to a term of imprisonment of twenty years to life. She now appeals, arguing that the court erred in denying her post-trial motions because: (1) the State presented inconsistent theories of guilt and thus failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) the court erroneously admitted testimony that defendant told a witness that she would like to shoot her husband; and (3) the jury instructions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BrochuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. State v. RideoutSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API