State v. Baird
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. Defendant was convicted of second-degree murder after a jury trial in Rutland District Court. The district court denied her motions for judgment of acquittal and a new trial and sentenced her to a term of imprisonment of twenty years to life. She now appeals, arguing that the court erred in denying her post-trial motions because: (1) the State presented inconsistent theories of guilt and thus failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) the court erroneously admitted testimony that defendant told a witness that she would like to shoot her husband; and (3) the jury instructions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BrochuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. LongleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. RideoutSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.