State v. Jesse L. Herrmann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 112. (concurring). I agree with the lead opinion's conclusion that Jesse Herrmann has not shown that the sentencing judge, Judge Ramona A. Gonzalez, was objectively biased in violation of due process. I write to clarify the due process recusal test. Citing cases including Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), the lead opinion states that "[a] defendant may rebut the presumption [that a judge acted fairly, impartially, and without prejudice] by showing that the appearance of bias reveals a great risk of actual bias." Lead op., ¶ 3. However, due process requires recusal only…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.