Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jesse L. Herrmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2015No. 2013AP000197-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.

¶ 112. (concurring). I agree with the lead opinion's conclusion that Jesse Herrmann has not shown that the sentencing judge, Judge Ramona A. Gonzalez, was objectively biased in violation of due process. I write to clarify the due process recusal test. Citing cases including Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), the lead opinion states that "[a] defendant may rebut the presumption [that a judge acted fairly, impartially, and without prejudice] by showing that the appearance of bias reveals a great risk of actual bias." Lead op., ¶ 3. However, due process requires recusal only…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API