Legal Opinion

Daniel E. Marken v. C. M. Goodall, a Widow

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1973No. 72-1882PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Daniel E. Marken appeals from the decision denying his prayer for specific performance based upon his alleged preferential right to purchase the working interest in an oil and gas lease owned by one R. A. Goodall, doing business as Goodall Oil Company, a sole proprietorship. In the alternative, Marken sought damages in the amount of $50,000 together with interest and costs. The Court held that Marken had waived any preferential right by remaining silent and acquiescing in the sale of the Goodall working interest to Atlantic Richfield on May 3, 1970.

In June of 1952…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Rio Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1964
  2. United States v. 79.95 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Pfister v. Cow Gulch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Hardberger and Smylie, a Co-Partnership, and William H. Rabe v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. C. H. Codding & Sons v. Armour And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Garcia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Curless v. CurlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Marshall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. John B. Ahern v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API