Patterson v. Hardin
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
HOLDER, District Judge.
The issues are presented by the defendants objecting to the convening of a three judge district court under Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 2284 by the district judge to whom the plaintiffs amended complaint has been presented, and requesting the district judge dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint for the failure to state a substantial federal question and for the failure to allege any other ground of federal jurisdiction therein.
It will be assumed in the absence of a specific motion that the prayer of plaintiffs amended complaint is procedurally correct to invoke the three judge…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Magraw v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Clemmons v. Congress of Racial EqualityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1958
- Johns v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1964
- Rice v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.