Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Hardin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 1, 1956No. IP 56-C-228PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLDER, District Judge.

The issues are presented by the defendants objecting to the convening of a three judge district court under Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 2284 by the district judge to whom the plaintiffs amended complaint has been presented, and requesting the district judge dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint for the failure to state a substantial federal question and for the failure to allege any other ground of federal jurisdiction therein.

It will be assumed in the absence of a specific motion that the prayer of plaintiffs amended complaint is procedurally correct to invoke the three judge…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Magraw v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  2. Clemmons v. Congress of Racial EqualityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
  3. Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1958
  4. Johns v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1964
  5. Rice v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API