Legal Opinion
MENG v. RAHIMI
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 1, 2022PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSCN Found Document:MENG v. RAHIMI
MENG v. RAHIMI
2022 OK 11
505 P.3d 926
Case Number: 119051; Consol. w/119196
Decided: 02/01/2022
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2022 OK 11, 505 P.3d 926
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Â
Â
LI MENG, Defendant/Appellant,
v.
MOHAMMAD RAHIMI AND TAHEREH DINPAJOOH, Plaintiffs/Appellees.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO REVIEW INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
¶0 Tenant petitioned for certiorari review of a certified interlocutory order urging that the trial court erred in failing to consider…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Johnson v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MENG v. RAHIMISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- Trillium Transportation Fuels LLC v. Integral Energy LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023