Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hill v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1990No. 88-1740Published

1DissentAlice Robie Re snick, J.

I must respectfully dissent as the majority misconstrues our holding in Wood v. Shepard (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 86, 526 N.E. 2d 1089. I also believe the majority has run afoul of the well-reasoned public policy of this state. As the majority correctly points out, the issue before this court is whether underinsured motorist coverage is available to an insured’s estate on a wrongful death claim, when the insured’s policy limits are identical to the tortfeasor’s.

The majority’s recitation of the facts is essentially complete. It should be noted, however, that the decedent (Shaw) was survived by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bohlen v. Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dick v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API